A structured diagnostic to understand how ready your organization is to adopt and scale AI responsibly.
We assess maturity across leadership alignment, strategy, governance, data foundations, risk management, and organizational capabilities.
The assessment provides a clear view of current gaps, strengths, and priority areas  benchmarked against global best practices.

‍Outcome:
A fact-based maturity profile, clear priority actions, and an objective baseline to guide governance and investment decisions.

A tailored framework defining how AI is governed across its full lifecycle.
We design decision structures, accountability models, policies, and oversight mechanisms that ensure AI initiatives remain aligned with business objectives, ethical principles, and regulatory expectations.
The framework clarifies who decides, who owns risk, and how AI systems are approved, monitored, and reviewed.

‍Outcome:
Clear governance structures, enforceable guardrails, and a shared understanding of responsibilities across the enterprise.

A governance- and risk-aware roadmap for enterprise AI adoption.
We translate strategic ambition into a phased roadmap that sequences use cases, governance actions, operating model changes, and platform enablement.
Unlike traditional AI roadmaps, this approach explicitly integrates risk tiering, compliance considerations, and organizational readiness.
‍

‍Outcome:
A realistic, prioritized roadmap that balances value creation with controlled risk and execution feasibility.

A practical model for running and governing AI across the organization.
We define roles, workflows, escalation paths, and interfaces between business, technology, risk, legal, and compliance teams.
The operating model ensures AI systems are governed consistently from ideation to retirement without slowing innovation.

‍Outcome:
Clear ways of working, reduced ambiguity, and smoother collaboration across all AI stakeholders.

A structured approach to identifying and managing AI risk beyond the model level.
We develop an enterprise-wide AI risk taxonomy covering model risk, data risk, operational risk, compliance risk, and systemic risk.
Risks are tiered, assigned owners, and linked to appropriate controls and review cycles.

‍Outcome:
A shared risk language, prioritized risk treatment, and defensible risk decisions for AI systems.

A set of practical, enforceable policies for responsible AI use.
We translate high-level responsible AI principles into concrete policy requirements that teams can apply in practice.
Policies are aligned with international standards and GCC regulatory expectations, and designed to integrate seamlessly with existing corporate policies.

‍Outcome:
Clear policy guidance that supports innovation while ensuring accountability, fairness, and compliance.

A centralized, living register of all AI systems across the enterprise.
Our proprietary playform provides a single source of truth for AI systems, models, datasets, owners, purposes, and risk classifications.
The inventory supports transparency, accountability, and regulatory reporting.

‍Outcome:
Full visibility into where AI is used, by whom, and under which governance conditions.

Standardized, lifecycle-based AI risk assessments embedded into workflows.
The engine supports consistent risk identification, tiering, and documentation across AI systems.
Assessments evolve over time as systems change, ensuring risk evaluations remain current and defensible.

‍Outcome:
Repeatable, auditable risk assessments that scale with AI adoption.

Continuous governance, evidence collection, and monitoring in one platform.
The hub links risks to controls, assigns ownership, tracks mitigation actions, and collects audit-ready evidence.
Dashboards provide real-time visibility into risk posture, compliance status, and deviations.

‍Outcome:
Operational assurance, reduced manual effort, and continuous confidence in AI governance.